2015-08-13 9:47 GMT+02:00 Shulgin, Oleksandr <[email protected]>:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-08-13 9:21 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <[email protected]>: >> >>> On 8/13/15 9:18 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: >>> >>>> nnulls() >>>> >>> >>> I think I'd prefer num_nulls() over that. >>> >> >> can be >> >> what about similar twin function num_nonulls()? >> > > Yes. But I'm can't see any precedent for naming it like num_*... And if > anything, should it be num_nonnulls() then? > it is detail - depends on final naming convention.
