On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:17 PM, David Rowley
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 December 2015 at 19:11, Simon Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 17 December 2015 at 00:17, Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd go with match_first_tuple_only.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> unique_inner is a state that has been detected, match_first_tuple_only is
>> the action we take as a result.
>>
>
> Ok great. I've made it so in the attached. This means the comment in the
> join code where we perform the skip can be a bit less verbose and all the
> details can go in where we're actually setting the match_first_tuple_only to
> true.

Patch moved to next CF because of a lack of reviews on the new patch,
and because the last patch has been posted not so long ago.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to