On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Ashutosh Bapat > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Ashutosh Bapat > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > The previous patch would not compile on the latest HEAD. Here's > updated > >> > patch. > >> > >> Perhaps unsurprisingly, this doesn't apply any more. But we have > >> bigger things to worry about. > >> > > > > Here's updated patch. I didn't use version numbers in file names in my > > previous patches. I am starting from this onwards. > > Ashutosh, others, this thread has been stalling for more than 1 month > and a half. There is a new patch that still applies (be careful of > whitespaces btw), but no reviews came in. So what should we do? I > would tend to move this patch to the next CF because of a lack of > reviews. > Yes, that would help. Thanks. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
