On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gilles Darold <[email protected]> writes: > > Then, should I have to use an alternate file to store the information or > > implement a bidirectional communication with the syslogger? > > I'd just define a new single-purpose file $PGDATA/log_file_name > or some such. > Would it make sense to have it as a symlink instead? -- Alex
