On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the > approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.)
FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is in a pretty good shape. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
