Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > On 6/9/17 11:12, Tom Lane wrote: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
> Good to know. That just says that if we were to go with the strcoll()
> result only, things would work correctly.
There's still the hashing problem.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
