Hello, Tom. You wrote:
TL> Pavel Golub <[email protected]> writes: >> I need someone to throw some light on grammar (gram.y). >> I'm investigating beta2 regression tests, and found new statement >> `ALTER USER ALL SET application_name to 'SLAP';` >> ^^^ TL> You'll notice that that statement fails in the regression tests: TL> ALTER USER ALL SET application_name to 'SLAP'; TL> ERROR: syntax error at or near "ALL" Oops! My bad! TL> The one that works is TL> ALTER ROLE ALL SET application_name to 'SLAP'; TL> and the reason is that AlterRoleSetStmt has a separate production TL> for ALL, but AlterUserSetStmt doesn't. Yeap, I see now separate rule for ALL in AlterRoleSetStmt. TL> This seems a tad bizarre TL> though. Peter, you added that production (in commit 9475db3a4); TL> is this difference intentional or just an oversight? If it's TL> intentional, what's the reasoning? TL> BTW, I'm quite confused as to why these test cases (in rolenames.sql) TL> seem to predate that commit, and yet it did not change their results. TL> regards, tom lane -- With best wishes, Pavel mailto:[email protected] -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
