On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think it does the contrary. The current mechanism is, in my opinion,
> downright dangerous:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]

A sort of middle way would be to keep the secondary checkpoint around
but never try to replay from that point, or only if a specific flag is
provided.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to