On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 10:20 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Also, is there a chance this is going to be back-patched? I guess it > would be enough if the ugprade target is v17 so it is less of a concern, > but it would be nice if people with millions of large objects are not > stuck until they are ready to ugprade to v17.
It is a quite invasive patch, and it adds new features (pg_restore in bigger transaction patches), so I think this is not for backpatching, desirable as it may seem from the usability angle. Yours, Laurenz Albe
