Hi Andrey, On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 1:09 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > > > > On 8 Aug 2023, at 12:31, John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > > > Also the shared counter is the cause of the slowdown, but not the > > > > reason for the numeric limit. > > > > > > Isn't it both? typedef Oid is unsigned int = 2^32, and according to > > > GetNewOidWithIndex() logic if we exhaust the whole OID space it will hang > > > indefinitely which has the same semantics as "being impossible"/permanent > > > hang (?) > > > > Looking again, I'm thinking the OID type size is more relevant for the > > first paragraph, and the shared/global aspect is more relevant for the > > second. > > > > The last issue is how to separate the notes at the bottom, since there are > > now two topics. > > Jakub, do you have plans to address this feedback? Is the CF entry still > relevant?
Yes; I've forgotten about this one and clearly I had problems formulating it in proper shape to be accepted. I've moved it to the next CF now as this is not critical and I would prefer to help current timesenistive CF. Anyone is welcome to help amend the patch... -J.
