Hi,

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
> 
> 22.04.2024 11:45, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This new thread is a follow-up of [1] and [2].
> > 
> > Problem description:
> > 
> > We have occasionally observed objects having an orphaned dependency, the
> > most common case we have seen is functions not linked to any namespaces.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > Looking forward to your feedback,
> 
> This have reminded me of bug #17182 [1].

Thanks for the link to the bug!

> Unfortunately, with the patch applied, the following script:
> 
> for ((i=1;i<=100;i++)); do
>   ( { for ((n=1;n<=20;n++)); do echo "DROP SCHEMA s;"; done } | psql ) 
> >psql1.log 2>&1 &
>   echo "
> CREATE SCHEMA s;
> CREATE FUNCTION s.func1() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL AS 'SELECT 1;';
> CREATE FUNCTION s.func2() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL AS 'SELECT 2;';
> CREATE FUNCTION s.func3() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL AS 'SELECT 3;';
> CREATE FUNCTION s.func4() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL AS 'SELECT 4;';
> CREATE FUNCTION s.func5() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL AS 'SELECT 5;';
>   "  | psql >psql2.log 2>&1 &
>   wait
>   psql -c "DROP SCHEMA s CASCADE" >psql3.log
> done
> echo "
> SELECT pg_identify_object('pg_proc'::regclass, pp.oid, 0), pp.oid FROM 
> pg_proc pp
>   LEFT JOIN pg_namespace pn ON pp.pronamespace = pn.oid WHERE pn.oid IS NULL" 
> | psql
> 
> still ends with:
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>         This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>         before or while processing the request.
> 
> 2024-04-22 09:54:39.171 UTC|||662633dc.152bbc|LOG:  server process (PID
> 1388378) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
> 2024-04-22 09:54:39.171 UTC|||662633dc.152bbc|DETAIL:  Failed process was
> running: SELECT pg_identify_object('pg_proc'::regclass, pp.oid, 0), pp.oid
> FROM pg_proc pp
>       LEFT JOIN pg_namespace pn ON pp.pronamespace = pn.oid WHERE pn.oid IS 
> NULL
> 

Thanks for sharing the script.

That's weird, I just launched it several times with the patch applied and I'm 
not
able to see the seg fault (while I can see it constently failing on the master
branch).

Are you 100% sure you tested it against a binary with the patch applied?

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to