Hi, On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:23 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:35 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the changes. v34-0001 LGTM. > > > > I was doing a final review before pushing 0001 and found that > > 'inactive_since' could be set twice during startup after promotion, > > once while restoring slots and then via ShutDownSlotSync(). The reason > > is that ShutDownSlotSync() will be invoked in normal startup on > > primary though it won't do anything apart from setting inactive_since > > if we have synced slots. I think you need to check 'StandbyMode' in > > update_synced_slots_inactive_since() and return if the same is not > > set. We can't use 'InRecovery' flag as that will be set even during > > crash recovery. > > > > Can you please test this once unless you don't agree with the above theory? > > Nice catch. I've verified that update_synced_slots_inactive_since is > called even for normal server startups/crash recovery. I've added a > check to exit if the StandbyMode isn't set. > > Please find the attached v35 patch. >
The documentation says about both 'active' and 'inactive_since' columns of pg_replication_slots say: --- active bool True if this slot is currently actively being used inactive_since timestamptz The time since the slot has become inactive. NULL if the slot is currently being used. Note that for slots on the standby that are being synced from a primary server (whose synced field is true), the inactive_since indicates the last synchronization (see Section 47.2.3) time. --- When reading the description I thought if 'active' is true, 'inactive_since' is NULL, but it doesn't seem to apply for temporary slots. Since we don't reset the active_pid field of temporary slots when the release, the 'active' is still true in the view but 'inactive_since' is not NULL. Do you think we need to mention it in the documentation? As for the timeout-based slot invalidation feature, we could end up invalidating the temporary slots even if they are shown as active, which could confuse users. Do we want to somehow deal with it? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
