On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 5:39 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/18/24 09:10, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 10:54:56AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> >> I've added an open item [1], because what's one open item when you can
> >> have two? (me)
> >
> > And this is still an open item as of today.  What's the plan to move
> > forward here?
>
> AFAIK the plan is to replace the asserts with actually resetting the
> rs_empty_tuples_pending field to 0, as suggested by Melanie a week ago.
> I assume she was busy with the post-freeze AM reworks last week, so this
> was on a back burner.

yep, sorry. Also I took a few days off. I'm just catching up today. I
want to pop in one of Richard or Tomas' examples as a test, since it
seems like it would add some coverage. I will have a patch soon.

- Melanie


Reply via email to