Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:03:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hah. Seems like the comment for isall needs to explain that it
>> exists for this purpose, so we don't make this mistake again.
> How about something like the attached?
I was thinking about wording like
* True if DEALLOCATE ALL. This is redundant with "name == NULL",
* but we make it a separate field so that exactly this condition
* (and not the precise name) will be accounted for in query jumbling.
regards, tom lane
