On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > It would definitely make sense for a new port to start by getting > things going with gcc only, and then look at resurrecting xlc > support.
Sriram mentioned upthread that he was looking at both of them. I'd be ready to assume that most of the interest is in xlc, not gcc. But I may be wrong. Saying that, dividing the effort into more successive steps is sensible here (didn't consider that previously, you have a good point). -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
