On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:25:24PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: > Jan Wieck wrote: ... > Just to get some evidence at hand - could some owners of > different platforms compile and run the attached little C > source please? ... > Seems Tom is (unfortunately) right. The pipe blocks at 4K. On NetBSD-1.5S/i386 with just the highly conservative shmem defaults: Pipe buffer is 4096 bytes Sys-V message queue buffer is 2048 bytes Cheers, Patrick ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handl... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal h... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal h... Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal h... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor sig... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal h... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal h... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor sig... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor... Jan Wieck