"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been bit by that too, and so have other people. Maybe it'd be
>> worth the trouble to improve the message so that it explicitly tells you
>> when there are prepared transactions blocking the DROP.
> Yes, that should be easy enough.
I looked at this quickly and decided that we can do it with some small
changes to CheckOtherDBBackends(). I propose counting the number of
conflicting PGPROCs and adding a DETAIL line to the existing error
message:
ERROR: database "%s" is being accessed by other users
DETAIL: There are %d session(s) and %d prepared transaction(s) using the
database.
I'm aware that this phrasing might not translate very nicely ... anyone
have a suggestion for better wording?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
