2009/9/14 Steve Prentice <prent...@cisco.com>: > On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2009/9/14 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>> >>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>> So, I guess I'm sadly left feeling that we should probably reject this >>>> patch. Anyone want to argue otherwise? >>> >>> +1. I'm really hoping to get something done about the plpgsql parsing >>> situation before 8.5 is out, so this should be a dead end anyway. >>> >> >> I have a WIP patch for integration main SQL parser to plpgsql. I'll >> send it to this weekend. > > I certainly don't mind the patch getting rejected and agree that refactoring > the plpgsql parser is probably the best approach to this issue. However, I > think it would be more than a little strange to ship the named notation > feature without a solution for this problem. For reference, the problem is > that the function below causes a compile error because of the way plpgsql > blindly does variable replacement: > > create function fun1(pDisplayName text) returns void as $$ > begin > perform fun2(pDisplayName as pDisplayName); > -- Above line compiles as: > -- SELECT fun2( $1 as $1 ) > end > $$ language plpgsql; >
I am sure, so this this will be solved in next commitfest. This problem is related only to plpgsql. Other PL languages are well, because doesn't try to emulate SQL parser. Pavel > -Steve > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
