On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:23:57 +0100 Joachim Wieland wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
> <adsm...@wars-nicht.de> wrote:
> > And in addition i don't like the idea of having the sender sitting
> > around until there's room for more messages in the queue, because some
> > very old backends didn't remove the stuff from the same.
>
> The only valid reason why a backend has not processed the
> notifications in the queue
> must be a backend that is still in a transaction since then (and has
> executed LISTEN
> some time before).
Yes, i know. The same backend is probably causing more trouble
anyway (blocking vacuum, xid wraparound, ...).
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
