2010/2/16 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp>: > > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The dictionary data could be shared or minimally dictionary could be >> preloaded like some PL language. >> >> What do you think about this? > > Surely preloading is the most realistic approach, but I hope we would support > dynamic allocation of shared memory, and load dictionaries in the area and > share it with backends. We should avoid additonal calls of shmget() or mmap() > in the additional shared memory allocation, but we can shrink shared buffers > and reuse the area for general purposes. We often have serveral GB of shared > buffers nowadays, so dividing some MB of buffers will not be problem. >
I am for all solution, but using a shared memory isn't realistic now, and can be a problem on MS Windows. More - it can be difficult with some special custom non ro dictionaries. Regards Pavel > Regards, > --- > Takahiro Itagaki > NTT Open Source Software Center > > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
