On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Joel Jacobson <j...@gluefinance.com> wrote:
> > I think you are right about functions (and aggregates) being the only > desc-type where two objects can share the same name in the same schema. > This means the problem of dumping objects in different order is a very > limited problem, only affecting overloaded functions. > > I didn't include the arguments in the file name, as it would lead to very > long file names unless truncated, and since the problem is very limited, I > think we shouldn't include it. It's cleaner with just the name part of the > tag in the file name. > Why not place all overloads of a function within the same file? Then, assuming you order them deterministically within that file, we sidestep the file naming issue and maintain useful diff capabilities, since a diff of the function's file will show additions or removals of various overloaded versions. -- - David T. Wilson david.t.wil...@gmail.com
