On 01/27/2011 08:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Xiaobo Gu<guxiaobo1...@gmail.com> wrote:
20:25<jon_y>: please contact psql and ask for a list of accept()
implementations checked
It looks like we check each argument and the return type for a couple
of possibilities:
argument 1 can be int or unsigned int
argument 2 can be struct sockaddr * or const struct sockaddr * or void *
argument 3 can be int * or size_t * or socklen_t * or unsigned int * or void *
the return type can be int or unsigned int PASCAL
Yeah. it looks like the return type is the likely culprit. It looks like
it wants either a signed or unsigned int64. Also, the mingw64 API uses
the WSAAPI qualifier instead of PASCAL.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
