Tom Lane wrote: > Ola Sundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Whatever happened to that patch that Paul Vixie sent in, that was supposed > > to be applied? Why is it still in the TODO list? > > Because Paul hasn't fixed the outstanding problems with it: as > submitted, it reverted the painfully-agreed-to formatting behavior > for the inet datatypes. > > This could easily be dealt with (IMHO) by re-patching as we'd done > for 7.1. But Paul had an additional agenda item: he wanted to see > our code restructured as a pure wrapper around the published libbind > subroutines. I have no problem with that --- as long as someone > else does the legwork. So far, neither Paul nor anyone else has.
Yes, it is still in my review mailbox. Not sure how to handle it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
