Excerpts from Aidan Van Dyk's message of sáb jul 07 11:32:33 -0400 2012: > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no > > C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an > > extension. > > Nobody is claiming that pgdump shouldn't dump it. > > But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an > appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into?
I was thinking that it might make sense to group operators according to the type(s) they operate on, somehow. Using funny chars for names is guaranteed to cause problems somewhere. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
