On Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:50 AM Joshua Berkus wrote: > > > It stalled because the patch author decided not to implement the > > request to detect recovery.conf in data directory, which allows > > backwards compatibility. > > Well, I don't think we had agreement on how important backwards > compatibility for recovery.conf was, particularly not on the whole > recovery.conf/recovery.done functionality and the wierd formatting of > recovery.conf. > > However, with "include_if_exists" directives in postgresql.conf, or > "include_dir", that would be easy to work around. Don't we have > something like that planned for SET PERSISTENT?
Yes in SET PERSISTENT patch, it uses "include_dir". I wonder why can't we get this information from WALRcvData structure? It has the required information. With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
