On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Claudio, Stephen, > > It really seems like the areas where we could get the most "bang for the > buck" in parallelism would be: > > 1. Parallel sort > 2. Parallel aggregation (for commutative aggregates) > 3. Parallel nested loop join (especially for expression joins, like GIS) > parallel data load? :/ -- Michael Paquier http://michael.otacoo.com
