On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:37:44PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-05-28 14:32:07 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > We have a lot of code in PostgreSQL source tree with different > > > copyright notices, and there's no problem with that as long as the > > > coe is licensed under the PostgreSQL license. For patches that add > > > > Really? Where? I think we have removed them all, as far as I know. > > A quick grep shows: > > > > $ grep -r 'Portions Copyright'|egrep -v 'Global|Regents' > > ./src/backend/regex/regexport.c: * Portions Copyright (c) 1998, 1999 > > Henry Spencer > > ./src/backend/regex/regprefix.c: * Portions Copyright (c) 1998, 1999 > > Henry Spencer > > ./src/include/regex/regexport.h: * Portions Copyright (c) 1998, 1999 > > Henry Spencer > > ./src/include/getopt_long.h: * Portions Copyright (c) 1987, 1993, 1994 > > ./src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_directory.c: * Portions Copyright (c) > > 2000, Philip Warner > > ./src/port/getopt_long.c: * Portions Copyright (c) 1987, 1993, 1994 > > ./src/port/getopt_long.c: * Portions Copyright (c) 2003 > > Just remove the "Portions" part from your grep, and you will see quite > some more...
Oh, I see. Have we historically been OK with these as long as it is clear it is the PG copyright? I know we had do some cleanups in the past, but I don't remember the details, obviously. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
