On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> wrote: >> I'm still in interested in this idea and haven't found a good reason >> to rescind the general thinking there. > > It's an interesting idea. I wonder if it would be possible to make it > compatible with existing tools like ssh-agent instead of inventing our > own?
I don't understand what you mean: the aesthetic of that proposal was to act as pure delegation insomuch as possible to integrate with other programs, and the supplementary programs provided that I wrote just for the purposes of demonstration are short. (https://github.com/fdr/pq-resolvers, if you want to read the program texts) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
