> > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Good catch. Hmm this may be a serious problem because
> > > there's no way to know the row count when we use EXECUTE
> > > statements.
> >
> > I wonder if EXECUTE could/should be made to return the appropriate
> > command status string for the executed statement, instead of "EXECUTE".
>
> Maybe it's preferable.
I agree. Command status string is pretty essential!
Chris
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
