Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Josh berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > We should send the owner of the scariest patch something as a prize. > > Maybe a plastic skeleton or something ... > > I think it was a good idea to call it the scariest patch rather than > something more severe sounding. Having the poll only be half-serious > is a good way to avoid self-censorship, and emphasizes that we're > concerned about bugs that cause serious instability to the system as a > whole. We're less concerned about the overall number of bugs in any > given patch.
This guy reads my mind. Where's my tinfoil hat? > I would have appreciated more scope to say how confident I am in my > prediction, and how scary in absolute terms I consider the scariest > patches to be. It was purposefully ambiguous. Maybe it should have been stated explicitely. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
