On Friday, May 13, 2016, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> * Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org <javascript:;>) wrote: > >> > I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written > >> > assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit. > >> > >> Let's just go with 2016 instead then. > >> > >> At least then users would see how old the version they're running is (I > >> was just recently dealing with a 8.4 user...). > > > > We tried, that, "Postgres95". ;-) > > Awesome: Postgres16 > Postgres95. > > That won't be confusing now will it? :-) >
We'll just say you have to be using a special collation with 9.5.0 to get the right sort order.. ;) /me hides from Peter Thanks! Stephen
