On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <a...@8kdata.com> wrote:
> > > On 14/05/16 20:02, Petr Jelinek wrote: > >> +1 for going with 10.0 after 9.6 and 11.0 afterwards, etc. >> >> It will hopefully both end these discussions and remove the confusion the >> current versioning scheme has (I too heard way to many times about people >> using postgres8 or postgres9). >> > > Even worse: I've been told that a company was using "PostgreSQL 8.5" > ^_^ That's not necessarily the version numbers fault. That's them using an alpha version.. (Yes, I've run into a customer just a couple of years ago that were still on 8.5 alpha) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
