On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > >> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is >> not *only* a list of names anymore. >> >> synchronous_standby_config? >> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)? >> > > If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would leave > it as is. +1 David J.
