On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> (2) It seems like there are still a few big questions about this commit: >> - Is it wanted at the moment? It didn't seem like there's a >> consensus about whether or not this enhancement should be >> merged, even if the patch is pretty minimal. >> - It seems like there are two competing patch >> sets in play for this enhancement: Joy's and >> Peter's. Presumably at most one of them would >> be merged. > > These are things that reviews should be helping to decide. It's probably > a squishier topic than some patches, but if you're interested, feel free > to read code and weigh in.
Thanks. It sounds like worst-case scenario, I perform an unneeded review. I'll give it a shot. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
