On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > I tend to be suspicious of use of the type "long" in general, because > in general one should assume that it is no wider than "int". This > calls into question why any code that uses "long" didn't just use > "int", at least in my mind.
Yeah. Using things that are guaranteed to be the size we want them to be (and the same size on all platforms) seems like a good plan. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
