On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > This makes me wonder whether we were being penny-wise and pound-foolish > by not making Bitmapsets be a kind of Node, so that there could be IsA > assertions in the bitmapset.c routines, as there are for Lists. Most > Bitmapsets in a typical backend probably have only one payload word > (ie highest member < 32), so right now they occupy 8 bytes. Adding > a nodetag would kick them up to the next palloc category, 16 bytes, > which is probably why I didn't do it like that to begin with. > Still, that decision is looking unduly byte-miserly in 2017.
I think it's pretty dubious to change this, honestly. Just because it would have caught this one bug doesn't make it an especially valuable thing in general. Bytes are still not free. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
