On 05/06/2017 01:56 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 06/05/17 22:44, Vik Fearing wrote:
On 05/05/2017 02:42 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
+ This option is obsolete but still accepted for backwards
+ compatibility.
Isn't that incorrect English?
No.
It seems to me that this be non-plural,
as "for backward compatibility".
"Backwards" is not plural, it's a regional variation of "backward" (or
vice versa depending on which region you come from). Both are correct.
I am English, born & bred, and 'Backwards' feels a lot more natural to me.
Another data point:
$ grep "backwards-comp" doc/src/sgml/ref/*.sgml doc/src/sgml/*.sgml | wc -l
7
$ grep "backward-comp" doc/src/sgml/ref/*.sgml doc/src/sgml/*.sgml | wc -l
3
Another important question is whether there should be a hyphen there or not?
$ grep "backward comp" doc/src/sgml/ref/*.sgml doc/src/sgml/*.sgml |
wc -l
21
~/git-sandbox-pgsql/master (master)$ grep "backwards comp"
doc/src/sgml/ref/*.sgml doc/src/sgml/*.sgml | wc -l
11
It looks like the most popular spelling in our docs is "backward
compatibility". I'll go with that.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
