On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 01:09:36PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > On 05/10/2017 12:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> In terms of the alternatives I listed previously, it seems like > >>> nobody liked alternatives #3, #4, or #5, leaving us with #1 (do > >>> nothing) or #2 (apply this patch). By my count, Peter is the > >>> only one in favor of doing nothing, and is outvoted. I'll push > >>> the patch later today if I don't hear additional comments. > > > >> For the record, I also voted for doing nothing. > > > > Hm, well, anybody else want to vote? > > +1 for #2
Same, +1 for #2 (apply this patch) -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
