On 2017-09-25 10:01:35 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On a related note, the idea of removing pg_standby altogether has been > > proposed a few times.
Including recently by me http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170913064824.rqflkadxwpboabgw%40alap3.anarazel.de > > Apparently there are a few things that it still > > does better than standby_mode, but nobody seems in a hurry to do > > anything about that. Still, I'd be against spending a lot of time > > trying to improve a tool that has mostly outlived its usefulness - we > > ought to be trying to enhance the in-core facilities instead. > > +1. It's also pretty crummy code that has no test coverage. I'd just remove it. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
