On 6 October 2017 at 08:06, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-10-06 07:59:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> The only thing that gets me excited about a threaded postgres is the >> ability to have a PL/Java, PL/Mono etc that don't suck. We could do >> some really cool things that just aren't practical right now. > > Faster parallelism with a lot less reinventing the wheel. Easier backend > / session separation. Shared caches.
Yeah. We have a pretty major NIH problem in PostgreSQL, and I agree that adopting threading and some commonplace tools would sure help us reduce that burden a bit. I would really miss shared-nothing-by-default though. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
