On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I did miss the need to fix the docs, and am happy to put in some strong > wording about the security hazards of these functions while fixing the > docs. But I do not think that leaving them with hardwired superuser > checks is an improvement over being able to control them with GRANT.
Sorry about that. lobj.sgml indeed mentions superusers. Do you need a patch? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
