On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Maksim Milyutin <milyuti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Konstantin!
>> I wonder if somebody already investigate this problem or working in this >> direction. >> May be there are already some patches proposed? >> I have searched hackers archive, but didn't find something relevant... >> Are there any suggestions about the best approach to implement this >> feature? >> > > Maybe in this thread[1] your described problem are solved through > introducing Parallel Append node? > > 1. > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ3gD9dy0K_E8r727heqXoBmWZ83HwLFwdcaSSmBQ1%2BS%2BvRuUQ%40mail.gmail.com You may want to review [2] and [3] as well. [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9666.1491295317@localhost [3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM2+6=V64_xhstVHie0Rz=kpeqnljmzt_e314p0jat_oj9m...@mail.gmail.com -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
