On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:32:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Have gcc use -g, add --disable-debug, rename? > > Personally I don't like the idea of this behavior defaulting differently > depending on which compiler you use. I can see the practical arguments > for doing so, but it still rubs me the wrong way. Can anyone offer new > arguments pro or con here?
Not an argument.. I use gcc, and I configure --enable-debug --enable-cassert. I was surprised reading the discussion that the "--enable-debug" was superfluous and thought it didn't "feel right".. Cheers, Patrick ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly