On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:32:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Have gcc use -g, add --disable-debug, rename?
> 
> Personally I don't like the idea of this behavior defaulting differently
> depending on which compiler you use.  I can see the practical arguments
> for doing so, but it still rubs me the wrong way.  Can anyone offer new
> arguments pro or con here?

Not an argument.. I use gcc, and I configure --enable-debug --enable-cassert.
I was surprised reading the discussion that the "--enable-debug" was
superfluous and thought it didn't "feel right"..

Cheers,

Patrick

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to