On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is > > > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own > > > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here? > > > > Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several > > companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL > > and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not. > > We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ...
I agree. We shouldn't have to really care, so long as there are guidelines for which platforms/distributions/sources are supported. Thus, the binaries provided == all of that combined. I think that the aforementioned requirements is easier, and more intelligent to require of a support organization, but our dev guys were complaining a bit and sought this as a resolution to their complaints. I don't see it being entirely feasible, but we'll see. > ---- > Marc G. Fournier PostgreSQL, Inc (http://www.pgsql.com) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 -- Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Coremetrics, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
