* Rod Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Since the user accessing/writing to the tablespaces would be the > > > > postgres user I don't really think this 'solution' works in reality. > > > > > > I had assumed it would be a directory based quota rather than a user > > > based one. > > > > It's been a while since I played with quotas but I don't recall this > > option being available. > > Group quotas should be sufficient. Create directory readable/writable to > only the pgsql user, but have the group ownership be representative of > the user in question.
Rather ugly, and you'll run out of groups if you have alot of users (the
postgres user can only be in so many groups). It's a cute idea but I
really don't see it as being viable.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
