> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dawid Kuroczko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 June 2005 22:21
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
>
> On 6/30/05, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46
> > > To: Dave Page
> > > Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
> > >
> > > I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size().
> >
> > I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot
> > think of anything better at the moment though (maybe
> pg_component_size,
> > but that's equally random) :-(
> >
> > Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)
>
> pg_diskspace_size()
> pg_diskusage_size()
> pg_media_used_size()
> pg_allocated_size()
> pg_diskspace_used()
Unfortunately I think those are too generic - we also have
pg_database_size() and pg_tablespace_size() for which these would work.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
