Simon Riggs wrote: > I agree we *must* have the GUC, but we also *must* have a way for crash > recovery to tell us for certain that it has definitely worked, not just > maybe worked.
Doesn't the same argument apply to the existing fsync = off case? i.e. we already have a case where we don't provide a crash-recovery guarantee. -O ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
