On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:55:53PM +0000, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > > Dean, > > > > Maybe I missed something obvious here, but how does this patch handle > > the situation where people have turned on INTEGER_DATETIMES? > > > > Cheers, > > David. > > -- > > David Fetter http://fetter.org/ > > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Remember to vote! > > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > Sorry, I don't understand. I am new to this code, but I can't see > how the INTEGER_DATETIMES flag will affect this code. I am using the > macros and functions from instrument.h and explain.c for timing, > which appear to use gettimeofday() or QueryPerformanceCounter(), > coverting the result to a double to report the total time spent > running the query.
It's the double part I don't quite get. Shouldn't that be an int64 in the case of INTEGER_DATETIMES? Cheers, David. > > As far as I can see, the INTEGER_DATETIMES flag doesn't affect this > code. Am I missing something? > > Dean. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Free games, great prizes - get gaming at Gamesbox. > http://www.searchgamesbox.com -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
