Mike Yes this is a good idea. read the blog of dale. We are starting to manage all our project Moose, Mondrian, Glamour with metacello I'm waiting that doru and dale release a version with fixed api to write a chapter for Pharo by example2
Stef On Sep 16, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Michael Robers wrote: > I am interested in learning how we could use metacello. Not for 1.0. > Before we commit to it for 1.1 I think we would need to conduct an > experiment in parallel to get a feel for it. We should also review the > other proposals. Then commit to one proposal for 1.1 1.2 etc and make > the process work. Or we could stall 1.1 until we have a process in > place but I think we will still have fixes coming in we will not want > a lag. What do you think? > > Cheers > Mike > > On 16 Sep 2009, at 10:24, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I value the idea that when we look for a software (for example SIXX) >> we can find a version that is working. In the past we used Universes >> and >> if was successful. >> We cannot not have squeakmap and universe at the same time. >> I discussed with damien briefly about that and he told me that we >> coud >> have >> a metacello alternative. >> Now I wonder if for pharo 1.0 it makes sense. >> May be having a nice Universe for pharo would be good and important. >> >> Dale what do you think? >> Do you see metacello working in the story (may be for 1.1)? >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
