Bill, Monticello shouldn't have a problem sharing the package cache, although concurrent access in the package cache directory could be problematic, but you'd have to be in the middle of downloading a package into the cache in one image while accessing the package from the cache in another image...
Dale ----- "Wilhelm K Schwab" <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu> wrote: | Hello all, | | How do you handle a new version of Pharo? Obvious choices are to | unzip in the same directory with the previous image, and to create an | image-specific directory. I have succesfully put various images in | one folder in the past, but I worry about MC stepping on itself in the | then common package cache. There are some advantages to that | approach, but if MC gets into trouble, it's a bad idea. | | Bill | | | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
